tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5291591634697141288.post6516111181517335224..comments2023-04-26T10:22:33.141+01:00Comments on The Road to "Elder" ado: DistinctivesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5291591634697141288.post-71352073475459039992009-12-03T13:06:30.334+00:002009-12-03T13:06:30.334+00:00Dave, I will comment directly on that in a future ...Dave, I will comment directly on that in a future post.<br /><br />I have already prepared a post on anglicans and methodists. I will add a direct discussion of your point in a further future post.Blue, with a hint of amberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17689914726284208496noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5291591634697141288.post-22919873235499414682009-12-03T11:14:01.867+00:002009-12-03T11:14:01.867+00:00David,
Interesting. I had not read the wikipedia ...David,<br /><br />Interesting. I had not read the wikipedia article. The notes at the top and in the discussion are significant in making the status of the article clear - it being at "Start" level with concerns that it is more of an advert.<br /><br />It would be good to see some reflections from you responding to the exclusiveness comment. They could be added to wikipedia as citations for an alternative perspective.<br /><br />I do have a small concern though. I recently heard a mostly excellent talk by someone from New Frontiers who talked about the Methodist tradition, it was good except that it attempted to claim the heritage while totally ignoring the present. To a conference with a lot of Methodists it was not exactly helpful to look at current Methodism as just a source of heritage and buildings for New Frontiers.DaveWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14822407495120319380noreply@blogger.com